, 2003-06-09
Shiftless third-party prep courses have made MCSE certification less valuable. Is Microsoft's new security cert doomed to the same fate?
Expand all |
Post comment
Adding Security to the Cert
2003-06-09
George Capehart (1 replies)
George Capehart (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert
2003-06-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert
2003-06-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Perhaps it takes more than just more tests...?
2003-06-09
Penguinisto (3 replies)
Penguinisto (3 replies)
Perhaps it takes more than just more tests...? You mean like a 'brain'?
2003-06-09
Cirque du Microsoleil (3 replies)
Cirque du Microsoleil (3 replies)
Perhaps it takes more than just more tests...? You mean like a 'brain'?
2003-06-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
MCSE has value, but does RHCE?
2003-06-10
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
MCSE has value, but does RHCE? - RHCE? What's that?
2003-06-10
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
You'll learn once you get RIF'ed
2003-06-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Perhaps it takes more than just more tests... ungh, you again? doesn't this happen EVERY TIME?
2003-06-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Is that a Troytech in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?
2003-06-11
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Is that a Troytech in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?
2003-06-12
blacklight (1 replies)
blacklight (1 replies)
Is that a Troytech in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?
2003-06-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Is that a Troytech in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?
2003-06-17
blacklight (1 replies)
blacklight (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert
2003-06-09
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert, then watching the *nixers complain about it.
2003-06-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert, then watching the *nixers complain about it.
2003-06-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels
2003-06-09
Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (2 replies)
Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (2 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels
2003-06-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels
2003-06-10
Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (3 replies)
Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (3 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels
2003-06-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels
2003-06-11
Wolfgang...friend of Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (2 replies)
Wolfgang...friend of Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (2 replies)
Wrong attitude about security, but typical of Microsoft's outlook
2003-06-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)

[Quote]
And also, remember that only Windows needs to work before being secure. Windows needs its own security holes for working.
[/Quote]
Neither Windows nor *nix is bulletproof out of the box (OpenBSD comes really close, though). If you think any *nix install is the end-all and be-all of security, you have learned *NOTHING* from reading this site :)
[Quote]
Just do your network with Unix, the operating system that creates and still operates Internet.
[/Quote]
Cisco might disagree with you on that last clause :) (IOS runs more routers/switches/gateways than *nix combined, I'd wager)
[Quote]
You will have no problem of getting and keeping it operational, as you will have no problem to secure it.
[/Quote]
...unless you run NFS, or Wu-ftpd, or SendMail, or an older BIND, or .... (do I need to go on? :P )
[Quote]
Try to disable null session on a domain controler ;
[/Quote]
Easy. RestrictAnonymous=0x2. This is a common reg hack. To make it work on a W2k DC requires a fully W2k domain, however (no NT4 or Win9x clients).
[Quote]
try to block remote command execution over NetBios on a file server
[/Quote]
Again, basic security principles (no weak passwords, no extraneous admin accounts) will prevent this from being an issue.
[Quote]
; try to manage your server remotely without opening an access as large as a remote desktop ?
[/Quote]
Easy. Start->Run. Enter 'compmgmt.msc'. Right click on the top of the tree and select 'Connect to another computer...' . Did you do *any* research at all before you posted this?
Well, Troll, it's been fun. See you next time :)
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/166/20376#20376