Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Adding Security to the Cert
Tim Mullen, 2003-06-09

Shiftless third-party prep courses have made MCSE certification less valuable. Is Microsoft's new security cert doomed to the same fate?

Comments Mode:
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-09
George Capehart (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-17
Anonymous
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-12
Anonymous
Perhaps it takes more than just more tests...? 2003-06-09
Penguinisto (3 replies)
MCSE has value, but does RHCE? 2003-06-10
Anonymous (3 replies)
MCSE has value, but does RHCE? 2003-06-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
MCSE has value, but does RHCE? 2003-06-11
Anonymous
MCSE has value, but does RHCE? 2003-06-10
Penguinisto
MCSE has value, but does RHCE? - RHCE? What's that? 2003-06-10
Anonymous (4 replies)
You'll learn once you get RIF'ed 2003-06-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
You'll learn once you get RIF'ed 2003-06-11
Anonymous
You'll learn once you get RIF'ed 2003-06-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Actually... 2003-06-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Actually... 2003-06-12
Anonymous
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels 2003-06-09
Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (2 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels 2003-06-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels 2003-06-10
Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (3 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels 2003-06-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels 2003-06-11
Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels 2003-06-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert...and training wheels 2003-06-11
Wolfgang...friend of Heinz the Mercedes Benz Mechanic (2 replies)
>It made perfect sense to me. Actually, I >thought it was perceptive. Like a network >engineer, a mechanic is responsible for >maintaining the vehicle, not making sure it >is operated securely.

What you said was as above. Your exact words. The point is you're either incapable or not interested to go beyond the call of duty.

Just as you may drive around in 6th gear all day and blow the engine, just because the vehicle can drive around in 6th gear, doesn't make sense.

I expect my mechanic to inform of this, not stand there mute and simply replace the engine and let me go out again and do the same.

Sir, this is not a complicated process to understand. The fact that this is now the third time it has been explained to you and your "nitch" friend, simply re-validates the stupidity of what was written and what I read.

You are welcome to read what was written anyway you like. I will maintain that it is stupid, for stupid people and by a stupid person. Which in a nutsell can be spelled with one word: Microsoft.

Hope that helps.


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/166/20417#20417
You ALL need training wheels 2003-06-11
Brett F. Jones (2 replies)
You ALL need training wheels 2003-06-12
Anonymous
You ALL need training wheels 2003-06-12
Anonymous
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-10
blacklight
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-10
Anonymous
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-10
Gunter Geißler
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-10
Anonymous
design security from start 2003-06-12
Anonymous
Adding Security to the Cert 2003-06-12
Anonymous
Field Certified Engineer? 2003-06-13
Anonymous
MCSE raison d'etre 2003-06-13
madcow
MCSE had value? 2003-06-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
MCSE had value? 2003-06-16
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus