, 2003-08-18
Federal prosecutors in California went too far when they put a man in prison for disclosing a website security hole to the people at risk from it.
Expand all |
Post comment
(shrug) - he had it coming.
2003-08-18
Penguinisto (6 replies)
Penguinisto (6 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming.
2003-08-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming.
2003-08-18
Beelezubb (4 replies)
Beelezubb (4 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming.
2003-08-18
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming.
2003-08-18
CyCOtiC (2 replies)
CyCOtiC (2 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming.
2003-08-19
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Re: (shrug) - he had it coming.
2003-08-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming.
2003-08-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-18
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-18
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-18
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
The good, the bad and the ugly.
2003-08-18
Mabrick (2 replies)
Mabrick (2 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-18
Anonymous (8 replies)
Anonymous (8 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-18
Chris Humphries (3 replies)
Chris Humphries (3 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-18
Bob Radvanovsky (3 replies)
Bob Radvanovsky (3 replies)
It might have been better to talk to the press.
2003-08-18
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower or How to cover your corporate @$$ when sweeping a problem under the rug
2003-08-19
Ashaman (1 replies)
Ashaman (1 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower or How to cover your corporate @$$ when sweeping a problem under the rug
2003-08-19
Elc0chin0 (1 replies)
Elc0chin0 (1 replies)
Just where he has got the email addresses from?
2003-08-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
What about Cali's New Law?
2003-08-20
Nick Jacobsen (1 replies)
Nick Jacobsen (1 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
2003-08-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

Congratulations, by the way . . .
for missing the entire point of the article. This guy may well have been a jerk who "got what was coming to him", but that's not the issue. The issue is that the California justice system bastardized existing digital information laws to prosecute this lone jerk. The important issue is the effect of this precedent. While this guys actions were irresponsible and unethical, all he did was send emails. He exercised the freedom of speech, and it was for that reason alone that he prosecuted and found guilty. What this guy did was basically the equivilent of telling the person next to you in the checkout line at Best Buy that the TV they're buying is a piece of crap.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/179/21587#21587