Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower
Mark Rasch, 2003-08-18

Federal prosecutors in California went too far when they put a man in prison for disclosing a website security hole to the people at risk from it.

Comments Mode:
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-18
Penguinisto (6 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-18
Beelezubb (4 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-18
Anonymous (2 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-19
Anonymous
no good deed goes unpunished 2003-08-20
Anton Sherwood (1 replies)
no good deed goes unpunished 2003-08-25
Anonymous
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-18
CyCOtiC (2 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-19
Beelezubb
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-19
Anonymous
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-19
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
(beelezubb!) - he had it coming. 2003-08-19
scamerone
Re: (shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: (shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
he had it coming? I don't think so!. 2003-08-19
Jack.R.Abbit
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
Analogies 2003-08-19
SCamerone (1 replies)
Analogies 2003-08-19
Anonymous-Jerk (2 replies)
Analogies 2003-08-20
Drg (1 replies)
Analogies 2003-08-26
Anonymous
Analogies 2003-08-27
SCamerone
"Free Speech"? Puh-leeze. 2003-08-21
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Re: The criminal charges -

He had to get the e-mail list from somewhere, no? In light of Mr. Rasch's addendum in the talkbacks, the criminal aspect is much smaller than I had gathered from the original article, but getting the exact number of ISP customers in order to set up the mass mailing may have still been illegal, depending on how he found that number out (remember, it's been 6 months since he left...)

Re: Free Speech Online:

As for "free speech", I have some bad news for you:

There is no such thing as 'free speech' on the Internet. Servers are mostly operated and maintained by private entities, and what governmental servers there are also pass information through those entities as well. Therefore, you can say that the Internet is pretty much a privatized thing. Even the backbones are handled by corporations: MCI/Worldcom, Sprint, MCI, etc.

Since you wouldn't tolerate someone pasting pro-child porn propaganda on your bedroom walls, don't expect a mail server admin to tolerate mail that he/she finds repulsive, for whatever reason. An admin can pull your posts and mails because they contain the words "I love Al Gore", just as legally and easily as if they had contained child porn, and there isn't jack that you can legally do about it.

Tornado also has the perfect right to pull any mail they desire, even ones warning their customers that there's a problem with the ISP. It was a selfish and stupid move on their part, but legally they have the right to do it... please remember that.

/P

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/179/21727#21727
"Free Speech"? Puh-leeze. 2003-08-21
Anonymous
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-20
Anonymous (1 replies)
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-21
Penguinisto
(shrug) - he had it coming. 2003-08-26
Anonymous
Re: (shrug) - he had it coming. 2008-02-12
Anonymous
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-18
Anonymous (2 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
The good, the bad and the ugly. 2003-08-18
Mabrick (2 replies)
The good, the bad and the ugly. 2003-08-18
Elc0chin0 (1 replies)
The good, the bad and the ugly. 2003-08-22
Anonymous
The good, the bad and the ugly. 2003-08-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-18
Bob Radvanovsky (3 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-19
Elc0chin0 (2 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-19
Bob Radvanovsky
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-18
John Poindexter (1 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
He did the right thing. 2003-08-18
Anonymous
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-19
Ashamed US Citizen
Bill Gates deserves jail 2003-08-19
Anonymous
I was there when this happened 2003-08-19
Anonymous (3 replies)
I was there when this happened 2003-08-27
SCamerone
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-19
Jerry Westrick
Idiot 2003-08-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Idiot 2003-08-19
Elc0chin0
Read it yourself. 2003-08-19
Anonymous
As the saying goes... 2003-08-19
Anonymous
Rebel Without a Cause 2003-08-19
The Resonating Oscillator (3 replies)
Rebel Without a Cause 2003-08-20
Anonymous
Rebel Without a Cause 2003-08-20
Anonymous
Rebel Without a Cause 2003-08-20
Elc0chin0
The Government has gone too far. 2003-08-19
GWB (1 replies)
The Government has gone too far. 2003-08-19
Anonymous
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-20
Bob Radvanovsky
What about Cali's New Law? 2003-08-20
Nick Jacobsen (1 replies)
What about Cali's New Law? 2003-08-21
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
What about Cali's New Law? 2003-08-22
Elc0chin0
Discrepancies 2003-08-20
Kat (1 replies)
Discrepancies 2003-08-21
Elc0chin0
Why does Mark Rasch lie about his past jobs? 2003-08-20
One who knows (2 replies)
Oh, BTW, your zipper is open 2003-08-22
Anonymous
The Sad Tale of a Security Whistleblower 2003-08-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Factual References 2003-08-26
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Factual References 2003-08-26
Bob Radvanovsky
Fine 2003-08-28
agent1
Blame Hollywood! 2003-08-28
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus