, 2003-09-15
The software-maker's dismal security record seems to have left it immune to criticism and shame.
Expand all |
Post comment
Does Microsoft Give a Damn?
2003-09-15
Anonymous (6 replies)
Anonymous (6 replies)
Does Microsoft Give a Damn?
2003-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Don't Hold Strong Opinions About Something You Do Not Understand
2003-09-15
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
Don't Hold Strong Opinions About Something You Do Not Understand
2003-09-17
Billgatezebub is TEH DEVIL (1 replies)
Billgatezebub is TEH DEVIL (1 replies)
We Must Do Our Job
2003-09-15
Sean M. Lynch (2 replies)
Sean M. Lynch (2 replies)
Patch, reboot, patch, reboot....
2003-09-16
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Useless rhetoric
2003-09-15
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
If only Linux required as little as 38 fixes.
2003-09-18
Scott G (3 replies)
Scott G (3 replies)
If only Windows allowed scripting w/o the security headaches.
2003-09-18
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
If only Linux required as little as 38 fixes.
2003-09-19
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Of Course They Dont::Does Microsoft Give a Damn?
2003-09-18
Linux, Torvald. Mr. Linux Torvald to you. (1 replies)
Linux, Torvald. Mr. Linux Torvald to you. (1 replies)
Does Microsoft Give a Damn?
2003-09-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Only two Suse patches?!?
2003-09-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

Here’s a few, 1. Lets make a Service that activates tcp/ip filtering and that keeps it ON in all circumstances (currently it doesn’t), which actually requires 3 random keystrokes to get it to switch off. 2. Lets make a law that states that every programmer MUST run program XXX on all their sources to check for buffer/stack overflows before compiling (such programs actually do exist). 3. As the original inventor of the heuristic scanning technique I can easily say, make a law that every OS vendor MUST build in a basic heuristic scanner into their core system where they are allowed to increase their OS price by 5$ to cover their costs. And if any OS vendor actually states their intend to do this I am more then willing to redevelop my engine to suit their needs for free, yes you read it right for free.
Vendors, programmers, you know who I mean here, take your responsibility by its b*lls and deal with it.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/185/22363#22363