, 2003-09-22
We spend money, increase administration, and take away functionality. Is it any wonder that security people are so misunderstood?
Expand all |
Post comment
Nothing Lost. All Now Explained
2003-09-22
Lost and Found Dept. (1 replies)
Lost and Found Dept. (1 replies)
Lost in Translation
2003-09-24
Yoshira Takashi (7 replies)
Yoshira Takashi (7 replies)
Lost in Translation
2003-09-24
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lost in Translation
2003-09-25
Jesse Jackson (2 replies)
Jesse Jackson (2 replies)
Lost in Translation -- moderating these comments
2003-09-29
Editor (1 replies)
Editor (1 replies)
Lost in Translation -- moderating these comments
2003-09-29
Check out the corrective package from Microsoft Corp.
Check out the corrective package from Microsoft Corp.
Lost in Translation by Sophia Coppola
2003-09-27
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)

If you are a security person or a consultant and you are looking for unconditional love, go get your own lizard. I feel especially sorry for those security people who can't make their security policies stick try as they might, because they are not high enough on the corporate totem pole. Management will never understand the importance of security until they understand the unpredictability that inadequate security can add to their cost projections, and the damage that it can do to their business model in terms of lost revenues and lost profits (would you buy from an e-commerce site that can't keep your credit card confidential?).
To summarize, such things as revenues, profits, and cost control can exist only within the context of an adequate, strong security posture.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/186/22479#22479