, 2003-09-29
Citing a provision of the Patriot Act, the FBI is sending letters to journalists telling them to secretly prepare to turn over their notes, e-mails and sources to the bureau. Should we throw out the First Amendment to nail a hacker?
Expand all |
Post comment
Err, when you get done running the bullhorn...
2003-09-29
Penguinisto (6 replies)
Penguinisto (6 replies)
Err, when you get done running the bullhorn...
2003-09-30
Whatever (1 replies)
Whatever (1 replies)
sometimes it takes a bull horn right next to the ear
2003-09-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
one word: "consolidation.'
2003-10-01
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Penguinisto (1 replies)
The Subpoenas are Coming!
2003-09-29
El C0chin0 <mr.nasty@ix.netcom.com> (4 replies)
El C0chin0 <mr.nasty@ix.netcom.com> (4 replies)
The Subpoenas are Coming!
2003-09-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
WHY NO SCAN OF THE FBI LETTERS?
2003-09-29
SCEPTIC (3 replies)
SCEPTIC (3 replies)
To those who would give up liberty for safety: You deserve neither.
2003-09-30
Benjamin Franklin (1 replies)
Benjamin Franklin (1 replies)
To those who would give up liberty for safety: You deserve neither.
2003-10-01
Former Jarhead (1 replies)
Former Jarhead (1 replies)
government depends upon professional crackers
(undeniable) that they would rather have
vulnerabilities that they know about and are
not yet public stay out of the public, and
therefore not fixed.
It seems like the Adrian Lamo's and RFPs of
the world may threaten the ability of
government hackers to continue to gain
information. Now I don't know why the
government would like to maintain internal
access to the New York Times;^] Do you?
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/187/22671#22671