, 2003-10-13
The proposed cure for the Internet's security woes might help Microsoft competitors, but it would only make our security problems worse.
Expand all |
Post comment
Yet another bad article from our resident MS apologist
2003-10-13
Hay guys I'm lolling on THE INTERNET! (6 replies)
Hay guys I'm lolling on THE INTERNET! (6 replies)
Yet another bad article from our resident MS apologist
2003-10-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Yet another bad article from our resident MS apologist
2003-10-15
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-14
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
IPSec != Firewall
2003-10-14
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Conveniently glossed right over the whole point
2003-10-15
A no no miss (2 replies)
A no no miss (2 replies)
Conveniently glossed right over the whole point
2003-10-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

As usual your full of shit.
"The same guy who insists on opening attachments in Outlook will open attachments in whatever newly-developed Just-Like-Outlook software they'll be using on Linux. The same guy who runs as Administrator will run as "root." The same guy who doesn't use IPSec won't use IPChains. And the same guy who doesn't patch now, won't patch then."
Lets put blame where blame should lie, Microsoft products poorly written and are very vulnerable. Were moving away from them rapidly, Novell and Linux here we come!
Microsoft pruducts should be labeled a national security risk. When are you going to wake up and see the real world.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/190/23082#23082