, 2003-10-13
The proposed cure for the Internet's security woes might help Microsoft competitors, but it would only make our security problems worse.
Expand all |
Post comment
Yet another bad article from our resident MS apologist
2003-10-13
Hay guys I'm lolling on THE INTERNET! (6 replies)
Hay guys I'm lolling on THE INTERNET! (6 replies)
Yet another bad article from our resident MS apologist
2003-10-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Yet another bad article from our resident MS apologist
2003-10-15
Anonymous (4 replies)
Anonymous (4 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-14
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
CCIA Report is Bad Medicine
2003-10-14
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
IPSec != Firewall
2003-10-14
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Conveniently glossed right over the whole point
2003-10-15
A no no miss (2 replies)
A no no miss (2 replies)
Conveniently glossed right over the whole point
2003-10-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

Oh, and running an executable from an attachment. Outlook for Unix is surely going to save the attachment to a temporary area on disk, chmod+x it and then run it, all from a double-click. Why? Because that's much more convenient for the user.
It's pretty easy to make a unix system as insecure as Windows. In fact, this isn't a theoretical argument; Lindows sets up to run as root all the time by default. Why? Because it's easier for non-technical users, which is the target audience for Lindows.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/190/23172#23172