Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Ending the Free Lunch
Hal Flynn, 2003-11-26

Linux vendors spend money building security bug fixes. How much longer will they give them away for free?

Comments Mode:
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-26
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Cost of Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
The Cost of Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-06
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-26
Rob McQuillen
Lots of points missed... 2003-11-26
Penguinisto (2 replies)
Lots of points missed... 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lots of points missed... 2003-12-01
Penguinisto
Lots of points missed... 2003-12-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Lots of points missed... 2003-12-03
Penguinisto
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
Anonymous Coward
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
Anonymous (2 replies)
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-28
Anonymous
Apple no, Suse sure 2003-11-27
groovecat
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
cowbutt
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
Anonymous (2 replies)
Huh? 2003-11-28
OCG (2 replies)
Huh? 2003-11-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Huh? 2003-12-01
Anonymous
Huh? 2003-11-30
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-29
Anonymous (2 replies)
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-02
trips
HEEE HEEE 2003-12-02
Anonymous
Filet Mignon 2003-11-28
Tomothy Millen
Missed the point quite a bit 2003-11-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
The GPL, by defination prevents this problem from ever happening. If more than 5 people are using a piece of gpl software, no matter how old it is, someone will release a free patch for it. People have become way to dependant on prepackaged binaries from distros. They act like if their distro doesn't support them anymore their automatically a damsel in distress. Red Hat users can be fine for many many years to come, because all they have to do is keep downloading those tarballs and updating themselves. If distro X ever tried to charge me for a security fix on gpl software, I wouldn't think twice about opening the source up in vi and start on my own patch. Not enough people program anymore and automatically turn into retards the second they can't use their rpm's. BTW, I don't see how an OSX rumor relates _at all_ to software that has completely different licenses from OSX. I think more than anything this is a shot at Open Source Software trying to give it an image of a disorganized community full of opportunists whom prey on other's weaknesses.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/200/23924#23924
Missed the point quite a bit 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Missed the point quite a bit 2003-12-02
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-02
Anonymous
UH? 2003-11-30
Tripper
So wrong..... 2003-12-01
jmorris@beau.org
GPL - simple really 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
GPL - simple really 2003-12-03
Anonymous
wrong 2003-12-01
Anonymous
Freedom, not Freeness 2003-12-01
Frihet
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
esjatharvee
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Joseph Smith
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-07
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-02
Anonymous
Who actually fixes bugs? 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Who actually fixes bugs? 2003-12-03
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Z2
Ending the Free Lunch (IT reporting) 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Jouro-Lobbiest 2003-12-01
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-02
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-02
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-04
Anonymous
Lame article 2003-12-05
Anonymous
Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-05
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus