Ending the Free Lunch

Ending the Free Lunch
Hal Flynn, 2003-11-26

Linux vendors spend money building security bug fixes. How much longer will they give them away for free?

Expand all | Post comment

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-26
Anonymous (1 replies)

The Cost of Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)

The Cost of Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-06
Anonymous

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-26
Rob McQuillen

Lots of points missed... 2003-11-26
Penguinisto (2 replies)

Lots of points missed... 2003-12-01
Anonymous (1 replies)

Lots of points missed... 2003-12-01
Penguinisto

Lots of points missed... 2003-12-02
Anonymous (1 replies)

Lots of points missed... 2003-12-03
Penguinisto

There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch 2003-11-26
Anonymous

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
Anonymous Coward

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
Anonymous (2 replies)

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-28
Anonymous (1 replies)

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-12-01
Anonymous

"RedHat for example can't even
keep thier header files matched with the
kernel in their distributions."

The header files should match libc, not the kernel. They are the headers that libc was built with. (I have no idea whether Red Hat is doing that right or not.)

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/200/23976#23976

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-28
Anonymous

Apple no, Suse sure 2003-11-27
groovecat

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
Anonymous

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
cowbutt

Does Microsoft or SCO supply Security Focus writers? 2003-11-27
Anonymous (2 replies)

Does Microsoft or SCO supply Security Focus writers? 2003-11-27
picklepak

Does Microsoft or SCO supply Security Focus writers? 2003-11-29
Anonymous

Ending the Free Lunch 2003-11-27
Anonymous (2 replies)

Huh? 2003-11-28
OCG (2 replies)

Huh? 2003-11-30
Anonymous (1 replies)

Huh? 2003-12-01
Anonymous

Huh? 2003-11-30
Anonymous