Standardizing on Security

Standardizing on Security
Hal Flynn, 2004-01-14

The Linux standards group publishes 565 pages of data describing a standards-compliant Linux package. So why aren't any of them about security?

Expand all | Post comment

Standardizing on Security 2004-01-15
Anonymous

Would a standard enhance, or retard security? 2004-01-15
Anonymous

Standardizing on Security 2004-01-16
Anonymous

Bring in the zealots. 2004-01-16
Anonymous (1 replies)

Bring in the zealots. 2004-01-19
Anonymous

Fedora Core release 2 2004-01-16
Jared Robinson

Standardizing on Security 2004-01-16
Anonymous

Standardizing on Security 2004-01-17
Anonymous (1 replies)

Standardizing on Security 2004-01-19
Anonymous

Hal would be right... 2004-01-19
Anonymous

Standard Argument 2004-01-19
Anonymous

Standardizing on Security 2004-01-21
blacklight

Standardizing on Security 2004-01-21
Anonymous

There only need be standardization in the implementation of security. As to the method of the security, let chaos reign. From the chaos that is this planet come things diverse as from a volcano's devastation to a flowers sweet aroma. With standardization comes thousands of the same. Where threats are varied as the wind. Standardization has one direction.

Let chaos reign. It's more secure

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/207/24455#24455