Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Knock, Knock, Knock
Kelly Martin, 2004-02-20

If hundreds of thousands of people are still blindly clicking on attachments in their email, is there any hope of mitigating the threat of hundreds of thousands of compromised systems with open backdoors?

Comments Mode:
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-20
Dmitriy (1 replies)
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-24
Keith (4 replies)
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-26
Anonymous
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-27
Farzad
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-03-01
Anonymous
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-03-01
www.mobasoft.com
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-20
Anonymous (2 replies)
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-25
Anonymous (1 replies)
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-03-03
Anonymous
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-21
Anonymous
Ok Double Sided Swords 2004-02-21
Anonymous
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-24
Jack (1 replies)
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-28
Anonymous
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-25
Anonymous
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-26
fndude@hotmail.com
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-02-27
Anonymous
Pretty easy solution 2004-02-27
Potato Head
About 4 years ago on NT I wrote a little application, it was simple, ran an executable in a sandbox by shimming / hooking DLLS and only allowed certain functions.

It stopped a lot of buffer over run type attacks and stopped those stupid mass emailing and the like.

The shimmy to the App returned true to all suspicious calls, eg msvcrt.dll command shell, etc. For some shell calls I gave it bogus address and such, eg get hostname, address box was invalid email addresses, etc.

It also run executable under a user with less access than guest.

So to help stop this stupidity, a shimmy, sandbox runtime is really helpful.

cheers,
Mr Potato


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/221/25205#25205
Knock, Knock, Knock 2004-03-01
Robert Townley







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus