Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison
Mark Rasch, 2004-04-12

When a New Hampshire judge threw out chat-log evidence against an accused pedophile, he illustrated just how jumbled and confused Internet privacy law can be.

Comments Mode:
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-13
Anonymous
I pretty much agree with that. All major IM software programs have the ability to log conversations. Last time I checked, ICQ was the only one where logging was enabled by default.

But then, whenever one engages into a conversation with someone, he must be aware that his conversation may be recorded. Assuming that the other party's software has been left in its default configuration is not a valid argument. Settings are made specifically for that : allow change in the program's behaviour.

If the logging functionality exists in the software, expect to be logged, whether it is enabled by default or not.
Expectation of privacy when it comes to communicating with a perfect stranger makes absolutely no sense. Even if logging is not enabled, none of the chatters can know for sure who is viewing his chat session. It may be a fourteen year old girl, a detective, a bunch of college students having fun, or the producers of the latest reality TV show, broadcasting the chat live to all homes in North America.

From what I read in the column, the only difference here is that the detective used a third-party software to record the conversation. I can see that this makes the situation a little different, but then again, IANAL.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/233/25769#25769
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-15
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Copyright infringement in RAM 2004-04-14
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-12
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-14
bee-keeper
lawful interception? 2004-04-13
Anonymous (1 replies)
lawful interception? 2004-04-13
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-13
Anonymous (2 replies)
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-14
Anon E Mouse
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-15
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-13
Anonymous Joe
Need Guidance for Whose on First 2004-04-14
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-14
Ric Werme
and don't forget Trillian 2004-04-14
Anonymous
Pretty flimsy law... 2004-04-14
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-15
Roy Sullivan <lasheray@msn.com>
Dura lex, sed lex 2004-04-15
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-15
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-16
errtu
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2004-04-16
Anonymous
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2006-04-03
Firegirl
Chat, Copy, Paste, Prison 2006-04-28
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus