, 2004-06-14
Mass acceptance of the keyword scanning in Google's new e-mail service could leave government spooks feeling lucky.
Expand all |
Post comment
The Trouble with Gmail
2004-06-14
Todd Knarr (3 replies)
Todd Knarr (3 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization
2004-06-15
Asheesh Laroia [comments@asheeshenterprises.com] (2 replies)
Asheesh Laroia [comments@asheeshenterprises.com] (2 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization
2004-06-16
Mark Rasch (2 replies)
Mark Rasch (2 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization
2004-06-18
Roger (1 replies)
Roger (1 replies)
A different prospective? [ Your argument isn't analytical ]
2004-06-16
Bipin Gautam <visitbipin_hotmail+com> (1 replies)
Bipin Gautam <visitbipin_hotmail+com> (1 replies)

My point is this: The mailing list traffic is already public. Nobody is going to learn anything about me from that mail, and I actually may want to see ads for products related to the concepts and keywords in those messages. I can't think of a more appropriate use for Gmail.
It amazes me how there is so much discussion about the privacy impacts, as if the only use for email is private conversations. In fact, for sensitive subjects, I don't even use *my own* private email on my own server. Normal email is simply not secure. Why should anybody expect *more* privacy from Gmail?
I, for one, am impressed with the Gmail interface.
-Shawn Nunley, CISSP
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/248/26711#26711