Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
The Trouble with Gmail
Mark Rasch, 2004-06-14

Mass acceptance of the keyword scanning in Google's new e-mail service could leave government spooks feeling lucky.

Comments Mode:
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-14
Todd Knarr (3 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
Here the mail room does need permission, but it's usually one of the standard policies you agree to as part of being hired. But there's this: if you give permission for the mailroom to check your mail and sort or route it appropriately (eg. call you if you get documents from certain important people/clients), does the other party also have to give permission? I've never heard anyone claim that. The mailroom's acting on your instructions, and the other party simply doesn't get any say in the matter (with a few exceptions such as for legal matters, and those cases are usually special policy for the mailroom too).

I don't see where Google is any more a third party. My ISP runs procmail on their servers following my instructions in .procmailrc. Google runs their scanning software on their servers. The instructions aren't as explicitly from me as with procmail, but still if I didn't want Google doing the scanning according to the published rules I probably wouldn't have signed up for a Gmail account.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/248/26753#26753
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-17
magpublisher
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
Shawn NUnley, CISSP (2 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-18
Anonymous
Re: The Trouble with Gmail 2006-11-08
Anonymous
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-15
Asheesh Laroia [comments@asheeshenterprises.com] (2 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Mark Rasch (2 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Bill Eggers
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-18
Roger (1 replies)
Sender Right to Privacy 2004-06-21
Mark Rasch (1 replies)
Sender Right to Privacy 2004-06-21
Anonymous
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
C High (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-18
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-19
Matthew Murphy
The quoted law 2004-06-21
Matthew Durie
what about spam filters? 2004-06-21
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus