Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
The Trouble with Gmail
Mark Rasch, 2004-06-14

Mass acceptance of the keyword scanning in Google's new e-mail service could leave government spooks feeling lucky.

Comments Mode:
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-14
Todd Knarr (3 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-17
magpublisher
It's a search, but it's a search FOR YOU 2004-06-14
Roger (3 replies)
A search FOR YOU 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones
It's a search, but it's a search FOR YOU 2004-06-16
Anonymous
It's a search, but it's a search FOR YOU 2004-06-16
Josh
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
Shawn NUnley, CISSP (2 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-18
Anonymous
Re: The Trouble with Gmail 2006-11-08
Anonymous
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-15
Asheesh Laroia [comments@asheeshenterprises.com] (2 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Mark Rasch (2 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Bill Eggers
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-18
Roger (1 replies)
Sender Right to Privacy 2004-06-21
Mark Rasch (1 replies)
The term sender and recipient are obviously geared towards a half duplex mode like email and the like. THe law speaks of "intercpetion in transmission" and requires the consent of ALL parties. Just how you "intercept" an email is not clear. The federal law distinguishes between mail in transmission and that in temporary or permanent storage. But is email ever READ in transmission? Doesnt it have to be STOPPED to be READ?

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/248/26869#26869
Sender Right to Privacy 2004-06-21
Anonymous
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
C High (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-18
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
Anonymous
A different prospective? [ Your argument isn't analytical ] 2004-06-16
Bipin Gautam <visitbipin_hotmail+com> (1 replies)
A different prospective? [ Your argument isn't analytical ] 2004-06-16
Matt
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
Your logic makes using Antivirus Software Illegal! 2004-06-18
Bart Declercq (1 replies)
Your logic makes using Antivirus Software Illegal! 2004-06-21
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-19
Matthew Murphy
Your logic makes use of any machinery at ISPs entirely illegal 2004-06-20
Simon Hradecky
The quoted law 2004-06-21
Matthew Durie
what about spam filters? 2004-06-21
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2008-09-19
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus