Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
The Trouble with Gmail
Mark Rasch, 2004-06-14

Mass acceptance of the keyword scanning in Google's new e-mail service could leave government spooks feeling lucky.

Comments Mode:
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-14
Todd Knarr (3 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-17
magpublisher
It's a search, but it's a search FOR YOU 2004-06-14
Roger (3 replies)
A search FOR YOU 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones
It's a search, but it's a search FOR YOU 2004-06-16
Anonymous
It's a search, but it's a search FOR YOU 2004-06-16
Josh
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
Shawn NUnley, CISSP (2 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-18
Anonymous
Re: The Trouble with Gmail 2006-11-08
Anonymous
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-15
Asheesh Laroia [comments@asheeshenterprises.com] (2 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Mark Rasch (2 replies)
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Bill Eggers
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-18
Roger (1 replies)
Sender Right to Privacy 2004-06-21
Mark Rasch (1 replies)
Sender Right to Privacy 2004-06-21
Anonymous
The Trouble with your generalization 2004-06-16
Andrew Jones
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
C High (1 replies)
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-18
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-15
Anonymous
A different prospective? [ Your argument isn't analytical ] 2004-06-16
Bipin Gautam <visitbipin_hotmail+com> (1 replies)
A different prospective? [ Your argument isn't analytical ] 2004-06-16
Matt
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-16
Anonymous
Your logic makes using Antivirus Software Illegal! 2004-06-18
Bart Declercq (1 replies)
Your logic makes using Antivirus Software Illegal! 2004-06-21
Anonymous
The Trouble with Gmail 2004-06-19
Matthew Murphy
Your logic makes use of any machinery at ISPs entirely illegal 2004-06-20
Simon Hradecky
The quoted law 2004-06-21
Matthew Durie
what about spam filters? 2004-06-21
Anonymous
"Simply put, if a computer programmed by people learns the contents of a communication, and takes action based on what it learns, it invades privacy."
- unfortunately this is what spam filters do. they look into the contents of a message, rank it, and can perform different actions based on this rank.
While i do understand the point of the article, it just shows that law and common sense are often far apart.


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/248/26892#26892




 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2007, SecurityFocus