, 2004-07-21
Apple's OS X is not safer or less susceptible to vulnerabilities and viruses than other OSes, and Apple's secretive culture is bad for the security world.
Expand all |
Post comment
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-23
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Kev (1 replies)
Kev (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Chris (1 replies)
Chris (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Dan P (1 replies)
Dan P (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Daniel Hanson (9 replies)
Daniel Hanson (9 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure? So do something about it!
2004-07-23
Jon Coleman (1 replies)
Jon Coleman (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure- Yes
2004-07-27
John G (1 replies)
John G (1 replies)

I believe that there are differences in the OS X and Windows which make, and will continue to make, OS X more secure until Microsoft does a ground up rebuild of their operating systems - for example the root level vulnerability in Windows which allows apps high level access to the OS w/o user approval.
Also, to gripe at Apple for not providing security fixes immediately for 10.2 once 10.3 was released with them is a bit much. They actually shipped product on time (or within a sigma) with the promised features and a smaller pool of programmers - then got to work on patching the previous release... What's the current ship date for XP Service Pack 2?
EMA
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/256/27570#27570