, 2004-07-21
Apple's OS X is not safer or less susceptible to vulnerabilities and viruses than other OSes, and Apple's secretive culture is bad for the security world.
Expand all |
Post comment
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-23
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Kev (1 replies)
Kev (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Chris (1 replies)
Chris (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Dan P (1 replies)
Dan P (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Daniel Hanson (9 replies)
Daniel Hanson (9 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure? So do something about it!
2004-07-23
Jon Coleman (1 replies)
Jon Coleman (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure- Yes
2004-07-27
John G (1 replies)
John G (1 replies)

There are a range of OS's which natively have not had more than a handful of holes in every version for more than 8 years.
A single code mistake can generate a vulnerability. To believe that non-disclosure of unchecked code portions will maintain security is a farce. What is more likely is that those who have found holes are quite enjoying keeping real quiet about it right now, or possibly talking money with Apple.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/256/27595#27595