, 2004-07-21
Apple's OS X is not safer or less susceptible to vulnerabilities and viruses than other OSes, and Apple's secretive culture is bad for the security world.
Expand all |
Post comment
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-23
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Kev (1 replies)
Kev (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Chris (1 replies)
Chris (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Dan P (1 replies)
Dan P (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure?
2004-07-22
Daniel Hanson (9 replies)
Daniel Hanson (9 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure? So do something about it!
2004-07-23
Jon Coleman (1 replies)
Jon Coleman (1 replies)
Mac OS X ? Unix? Secure- Yes
2004-07-27
John G (1 replies)
John G (1 replies)

The issue is not whether it's "safer" to use Macs than PCs. It is, partly because the platform is rarely specifically targeted. Nor is it whether it's intrinsically safer because of the Mac's all-round superiority and unparalleled security model. It isn't, though it's made reasonably secure out of the box and can be made a lot more secure. (So can Windows.)
The issue is, does the tendency of Mac evangelists to overreact to any suggestion that their chosen platform isn't perfect in every respect leave them worryingly open to attacks based on a presumed invulnerability?
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/256/27641#27641