A Promise Falls in the Forest

A Promise Falls in the Forest
Mark Rasch, 2004-07-26

A federal court recently ruled that website privacy policies aren't binding, because nobody reads them. The implications are far reaching for contract law and the Internet.

Expand all | Post comment

Shrink wrapped and click through agreements challenged? 2004-07-26
John the Kiwi (1 replies)

Shrink wrapped and click through agreements challenged? 2004-07-27
Y (1 replies)

Shrink wrapped and click through agreements challenged? 2004-08-03
Anonymous

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-26
Anonymous- Your Not Data-mining Me! (1 replies)

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-28
Anonymous Amateur

Looks Like a Duck, Smells Like a Duck...it's a Pineapple 2004-07-26
Dave

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-26
Anonymous (1 replies)

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-28
Anonymous

Time for an appeal ! 2004-07-27
Daniel Convissor

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-27
Anonymous

Rogue state 2004-07-28
Louis Bertrand

So you could apply the same to an EULA 2004-07-28
Anonymous

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-28
Anonymous

Does this mean that I can now, "not read" the piracy laws and have them not apply whenever I want to copy a game?? That's a ludicrous ruling. By extension, are criminals now not criminals because they did not read the fine print. yeah right.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/257/27721#27721

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-29
L. Kelly

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-29
Anonymous

Won't this also apply to the disclaimer? 2004-07-29
Anonymous (1 replies)

Won't this also apply to the disclaimer? 2004-07-30
Anonymous

Won't this also apply to the disclaimer? 2004-07-29
Anonymous

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-07-30
Anonymous

Will not apply to EULA 2004-07-31
-bildr

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-08-02
Steerpike

A Promise Falls in the Forest 2004-08-02
Anonymous