Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Redmond's Salvation
Tim Mullen, 2004-08-11

Service Pack 2 for XP represents a sea change in Microsoft's security posture. Here's why you should ignore the naysayers and start planning your upgrade.

Comments Mode:
Redmond's Salvation? What? 2004-08-11
Dave (2 replies)
Redmonds Salvation? What? Think. 2004-08-14
FL Jim (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Rob Hughes (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-18
Hytham
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Texas Opinion (2 replies)
Redmonds Salvation 2004-08-14
FL Jim
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Harsem
4 words for you! 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
4 words for you! 2004-08-14
Anonymous
Another 4 words for you! 2004-08-17
Andy
NMAP? 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
NMAP? 2004-08-16
Anonymous
NMAP? 2004-08-17
Hytham
Be careful, SP2 opens ports 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Be careful, SP2 opens ports 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Peter
"... if you make the choice (or your company does for you) to maintain older, less secure software when you know something far better is out there, then you must take responsibility for your security posture." ... beter security ? Were you talking about Linux ?


"Even if you still consider Windows 2000 'current' ...". Well, do you know many 200+ companies running XP only ? Only small companies and home users get a mandatory XP bundled with (brand) computers they buy.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/259/27905#27905
A better idea 2004-08-12
Aenox (1 replies)
Typewriters are vulnerable too! 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Typewriters are vulnerable too! 2004-08-17
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Frizzle
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Bug Me Not <sf@dodgeit.com> (1 replies)
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-14
Anonymous
Well and good, but... 2004-08-12
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Well and good, but... 2004-08-12
MaxeyPad
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond&#39;s Salvation 2004-08-12
LinuxFire (1 replies)
Redmond&amp;#39;s Salvation 2004-08-19
Reynaldo Ruiz
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-16
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-16
m0rpheus
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-19
Reynaldo Ruiz
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-21
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus