Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Redmond's Salvation
Tim Mullen, 2004-08-11

Service Pack 2 for XP represents a sea change in Microsoft's security posture. Here's why you should ignore the naysayers and start planning your upgrade.

Comments Mode:
Redmond's Salvation? What? 2004-08-11
Dave (2 replies)
Redmonds Salvation? What? Think. 2004-08-14
FL Jim (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Rob Hughes (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-18
Hytham
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Texas Opinion (2 replies)
Redmonds Salvation 2004-08-14
FL Jim
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Harsem
4 words for you! 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
4 words for you! 2004-08-14
Anonymous
Another 4 words for you! 2004-08-17
Andy
NMAP? 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
NMAP? 2004-08-16
Anonymous
NMAP? 2004-08-17
Hytham
Be careful, SP2 opens ports 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Be careful, SP2 opens ports 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Peter
A better idea 2004-08-12
Aenox (1 replies)
How about, instead of downgrading to SP2, we convert to typewriters. They have been around since 1870 and still no security issues have been found. In fact, if we really want security as a major priority over functionality, we could just go back to pencil and paper.

XP SP2 reduces our freedoms, slows us down and nags as much as if we were married to it. Rather than fix any bugs this service pack is much more likely to create them. If you think updates must always be an improvement, think again.

BTW, why is it that security experts want improved security by default? AV companies don't. Doesn't it affect their income also?

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/259/27907#27907
Typewriters are vulnerable too! 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Typewriters are vulnerable too! 2004-08-17
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Frizzle
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Bug Me Not <sf@dodgeit.com> (1 replies)
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-14
Anonymous
Well and good, but... 2004-08-12
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Well and good, but... 2004-08-12
MaxeyPad
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond&#39;s Salvation 2004-08-12
LinuxFire (1 replies)
Redmond&amp;#39;s Salvation 2004-08-19
Reynaldo Ruiz
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-16
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-16
m0rpheus
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-19
Reynaldo Ruiz
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-21
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus