Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Redmond's Salvation
Tim Mullen, 2004-08-11

Service Pack 2 for XP represents a sea change in Microsoft's security posture. Here's why you should ignore the naysayers and start planning your upgrade.

Comments Mode:
Redmond's Salvation? What? 2004-08-11
Dave (2 replies)
Redmonds Salvation? What? Think. 2004-08-14
FL Jim (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Rob Hughes (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-18
Hytham
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (2 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Texas Opinion (2 replies)
Redmonds Salvation 2004-08-14
FL Jim
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-15
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-11
Harsem
4 words for you! 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
4 words for you! 2004-08-14
Anonymous
Another 4 words for you! 2004-08-17
Andy
NMAP? 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
NMAP? 2004-08-16
Anonymous
NMAP? 2004-08-17
Hytham
Be careful, SP2 opens ports 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Be careful, SP2 opens ports 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-13
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Peter
A better idea 2004-08-12
Aenox (1 replies)
Typewriters are vulnerable too! 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Typewriters are vulnerable too! 2004-08-17
Anonymous
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Frizzle
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Bug Me Not <sf@dodgeit.com> (1 replies)
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Anonymous (2 replies)
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-12
Anonymous
Big Improvements..... yeah right 2004-08-14
Anonymous
Well and good, but... 2004-08-12
Penguinisto (1 replies)
Well and good, but... 2004-08-12
MaxeyPad
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-12
Anonymous (1 replies)
Redmond&#39;s Salvation 2004-08-12
LinuxFire (1 replies)
Redmond&amp;#39;s Salvation 2004-08-19
Reynaldo Ruiz
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-16
Anonymous
Comming from a small business with about 50 windows 2k machines in place, the migration towards windcws XP just does not cut it, if only for security reasons.
Why should I force a change to my IT enviroment if I have maintain my vigilance in keeping my machines as "safe" as possible. These machines offer the needed functionality to keep production chugging along. With a perimiter firewall in place with egress/ingress rules in place, I dont have any worries besides constance watch. With a proper policy and network configuration, remote access and laptops do not infect or bother the infrastructure.
If people cannot be bothered to do their homework, then I dont see why empahsis should be placed on the products they choose. They did CHOOSE/PLAN to use in their infrastructure. Take responsibility in what you use.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/259/27971#27971
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-16
m0rpheus
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-19
Reynaldo Ruiz
Redmond's Salvation 2004-08-21
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus