Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Open Source Versus Closed Source Security
Jason Miller, 2004-09-30

In the age old battle between open source and closed source operating systems and applications, can either of them really be considered more secure than the other?

Comments Mode:
One Definite Benefit 2004-10-04
SFN (1 replies)
One Definite Benefit - What??? 2004-10-04
Anon (1 replies)
One Definite Benefit - What??? 2004-10-05
Anonymous (2 replies)
One Definite Benefit - What??? 2004-10-06
Anonymous
One Definite Benefit - What??? 2004-10-06
Anonymous
Open Source Versus Closed Source Security 2004-10-05
Paul Kosinski (1 replies)
Open Source Versus Closed Source Security 2004-10-05
Anonymous (1 replies)
Open Source Versus Closed Source Security 2004-10-07
Serious Sam (1 replies)
Open Source Versus Closed Source Security 2004-10-08
gmr
Yes, but what guarantee is there that larger will always equal better? Isn't it possible to have a smaller but more focused and better-qualified group that outperfoms a larger but less focused group? That was more the point I was making - that trade-offs are potentially involved. I'm not saying that's the case with Microsoft and Linux, but if you're making in-principle arguments, then I think it's a legitimate hypothetical case.

On cryptography, a complicating factor there is that the 'closed-source' opposition is primarily agencies like the NSA, who aren't going to be disclosing their capabilities anytime soon, making that sort of argument (I think) much harder to evaluate.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/269/28692#28692







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus