, 2004-12-01
Trust with hardware vendors for open source systems is becoming a one-way street, where in exchange for support they offer a closed source binary solution with no provision to audit security.
Expand all |
Post comment
Closed Source Hardware
2004-12-03
JTC (1 replies)
JTC (1 replies)
Closed Source Hardware - Clarifications
2004-12-03
Jason V. Miller (Author) (4 replies)
Jason V. Miller (Author) (4 replies)
Closed Source Hardware - Clarifications
2004-12-04
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Closed Source Hardware - Clarifications
2004-12-06
Jason V. Miller (Author) (1 replies)
Jason V. Miller (Author) (1 replies)

Some other "free software" options (FreeBSD) don't even require derivative product to distribute the source and modifications.
The GPL is an amazing license, and I am happy that a company like Novell or Redhat can make a profit by putting together a useable and SUPPORTED distribution, while a group like Debian and Gentoo can use the same source code, and put together a different distribution with different aims.
Diversity is good.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/281/29405#29405