Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime
Mark Rasch, 2004-12-27

Comments Mode:
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Anonymous (2 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Repoman (4 replies)
From one extreme to the next 2004-12-28
Anonymous
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Mark Bryant (2 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-29
Anonymous
Right. For some reason I don't understand, destroying something isn't considered as bad as stealing the same thing from the owner. In some ways, it's worse - you cannot possibly restore the stolen item to the owner.

For example, some years ago, there was an uproar because an American teenager got caned in Singapore for some vandalism. He destroyed the paint job on some cars. Some people were outraged at such punishment for "mere vandalism". But at the time, I figured that he did $20,000 worth of damage. If he had simply stolen $20,000, he'd have been lucky to escape with just a caning...

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/287/29724#29724
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam: Punishment 2004-12-29
Anonymous
Exactly 2004-12-29
Aenox (2 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-01
Anonymous (2 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-05
Anonymous
Exactly 2005-01-05
Aenox
Exactly 2005-01-02
cj (1 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-05
Aenox
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-31
fianna (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2005-01-03
Mark Ferguson
But if they paid taxes... 2005-01-03
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus