Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime
Mark Rasch, 2004-12-27

Comments Mode:
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Anonymous (2 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
It is not proportional. I would like sommeone to calculate whatever it takes 9 years to clean your mailbox.
I would also like the same sentences applied to companies that do mail marketting.
In any case we cannot compare the financial loss due to SPAM to the loss of human lives. I think this is what the author meant by citing Union Carbide.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/287/29728#29728
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Repoman (4 replies)
From one extreme to the next 2004-12-28
Anonymous
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Mark Bryant (2 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam: Punishment 2004-12-29
Anonymous
Exactly 2004-12-29
Aenox (2 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-01
Anonymous (2 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-05
Anonymous
Exactly 2005-01-05
Aenox
Exactly 2005-01-02
cj (1 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-05
Aenox
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-31
fianna (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2005-01-03
Mark Ferguson
But if they paid taxes... 2005-01-03
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus