Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime
Mark Rasch, 2004-12-27

Comments Mode:
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Anonymous (2 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Repoman (4 replies)
From one extreme to the next 2004-12-28
Anonymous
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-28
Mark Bryant (2 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam: Punishment 2004-12-29
Anonymous
Exactly 2004-12-29
Aenox (2 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-01
Anonymous (2 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-05
Anonymous
Exactly 2005-01-05
Aenox
Exactly 2005-01-02
cj (1 replies)
Exactly 2005-01-05
Aenox
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-29
Anonymous (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-30
Anonymous (2 replies)
Mark,

you are comparing apples with oranges.

The spammers convicted didn't get convicted for a single spam, or a single crime. They did get convicted for millions, if not billions of crimes! If the spammer is sentenced to 9 years in total, he serves not even 1 second per crime.

Compare that with a robber or murderer - if such an individual had committed billions of robberies or murders, he'd be sentenced to serve billions of life time imprisonments(according to US legal proceedings - different in Europe).

So, the sentences for the crimes still stand in a good relation.



[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/287/29735#29735
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2004-12-31
fianna (1 replies)
Spam Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime 2005-01-03
Mark Ferguson
But if they paid taxes... 2005-01-03
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus