, 2005-01-06
Microsoft has jumped into the anti-spyware market, but is this a new approach to thwarting bugs, or are they gearing up to profit from a dubious industry they helped create?
Expand all |
Post comment
Why let MS have a chance in this derby? Re: Microsoft Anti-Spyware?
2005-01-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Why let MS have a chance in this derby? Re: Microsoft Anti-Spyware?
2005-01-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft Anti-Spyware?
2005-01-10
Tommy Ward (1 replies)
Tommy Ward (1 replies)

Somehow the producers of such anti-spyware programs as Ad-Aware, Spybot S&D, and WinPatrol manage to get them to work on ALL Windows OSs - including Windows 95 - and yet they are all FREE. Are you really suggesting that with its comparatively huge wealth and resources M$ couldn't spare whatever tiny amount of effort (and I suspect it would actually be zero) that it would take to get their program to run on Windows 98?
Isn't the real truth that Microsoft's anti-spyware program is deliberately crippled to not run on Windows 98 as a further inducement, or pressure, for users of that operating system to "upgrade" to Windows XP or its successor? In other words, as ever for M$, is it not just simply a matter of pure calculated greed?
P.s. Is your real name Mr Bill ("There is no such thing as being too rich.") Gates?
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/289/32503#32503