Under Australian law a spider program is not a legal entity in the same way that a person is and therefore can't enter into contracts under the law. Hence the operator of the program is not bound by the license unless they're explicitly aware that their program is entering into license agreements on their behalf and are using the program as a tool to avoid the legal obligation. That's not the case here.

Since the honeypot project is imposing these licenses by stealth no judge in Australia would rule in favor of the honeypot project if the spammer challenged the validity of the license.

I presume that contract law in the US is pretty similar in this respect so the honeypot license probably has no force in law.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/291/30069#30069