Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Microsoft's Velvet Glove
Mark Burnett, 2005-01-31

Redmond's plan to make you install Windows authentication software before downloading vital security patches is a reasonable and gentle effort to limit piracy.

Comments Mode:
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous (2 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-04
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-05
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
j0hnsolo
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Aenox (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-03
Anonymous
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-01
Anonymous (3 replies)
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-02
Anonymous
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Or they could ship a version that isn't full of bugs in the first place... then Microsoft's bandwidth bill would be greatly reduced.

I have no love for pirates, but I know people who rip off Windows and I know people who buy it legally -- and it's the legit owners who have more hassle. If Microsoft's aim is to drive it's legitimate consumers into the arms of alternatives, it's doing a mighty fine job of it.

Personally, I'm happy as I am -- an exclusively Linux user, piracy-free and without giving a cent to Microsoft.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/295/30329#30329
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-08
Anonymous
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-04
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-04
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous (2 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous (3 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-04
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-04
Steve
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-05
Bernard Roizen
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-07
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-07
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-07
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-08
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-09
VBDude
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-09
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-12
James C. Foster







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus