, 2005-01-31
Redmond's plan to make you install Windows authentication software before downloading vital security patches is a reasonable and gentle effort to limit piracy.
Expand all |
Post comment
Microsoft's Velvet Glove
2005-02-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove
2005-02-01
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove
2005-02-02
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove
2005-02-02
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove
2005-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

Every worm, virus, and other misconfigured windows crap sending their junk to my non-Windows and fairly secure systems is eating up my bandwidth...maybe I should start charging Microsoft for my bandwidth gobbled up by their broken operating system?
After all, they spend so much time educating their users as to how to patch their OSs and go out of their way to make their security patches available to anyone that uses their stuff that it is so hard to believe that there is so much crap out there on the network.
My copy of Windows XP that I legally purchased came with no documentation stating that patches were even necessary, much less where to get them and the right way to install them so that they don't blow up and take out my box. How do they expect folks who legally have purchased the software to actually get the patches...quite frankly, I am more happy with a secured but pirated Windoze box than I am with an unsecure but legal one.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/295/30338#30338