Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Microsoft's Velvet Glove
Mark Burnett, 2005-01-31

Redmond's plan to make you install Windows authentication software before downloading vital security patches is a reasonable and gentle effort to limit piracy.

Comments Mode:
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous (2 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-04
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-05
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
j0hnsolo
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Aenox (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-03
Anonymous
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-01
Anonymous (3 replies)
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-02
Anonymous
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-08
Anonymous
Bandwidth costs 2005-02-04
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-01
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-04
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous (2 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous (3 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-02
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-04
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-04
Steve
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-05
Bernard Roizen
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-07
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-07
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-07
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-08
Anonymous
First off, and this should go without saying...
If it can be built, it can be broken.
MS is incapable of building a perfect system, as is any other vendor out there, because there will be people who will spend hours and weeks finding a way to break it. I am a game programmer, and no matter how hard I try to make things fair for my players, there are a few who find a way around EVERY security measure. 'Nix users are "safer" because they arent the biggest target. It is always easier to be in second place because people by nature want to try and knock #1 off of top of the mountain. Could MS do a better job, probably. I am not the worlds best programmer, but I hold my own, and I have drawn things out from top to bottom, and at the end of the day, I still come up with a couple of logic / run-time errors inside of 100K lines of code that get found by a player who takes advantage of it. I fix it, player finds another logic error. I would love to see a bare OS from MS with just the networking pack / directx support though. I would love for anyone on here to show me a link to a 100% stable, secure, uncrashable, perfectly designed for every user 'Nix OS. Bottom line:
"There is no patch for human stupidity"

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/295/30410#30410
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-09
VBDude
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-09
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Microsoft's Velvet Glove 2005-02-12
James C. Foster







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus