, 2005-02-02
Recent events have shown that the way security in the Linux kernel is handled is broken, and it needs to be fixed right now.
Expand all |
Post comment
Linux Kernel Security is Lacking
2005-02-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Linux Kernel Security is Lacking
2005-02-04
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
"The numbers" and (deliberate?) failure to undestand what linux is
2005-02-07
RedHat not Linux User. (1 replies)
RedHat not Linux User. (1 replies)
Re: The "numbers" and (deliberate?) failure to undestand what linux is
2005-02-07
Jason V. Miller (Author) (1 replies)
Jason V. Miller (Author) (1 replies)
Linux Kernel Security is Lacking
2005-02-03
Todd Knarr (1 replies)
Todd Knarr (1 replies)
Linux Kernel Security is Lacking
2005-02-04
Jason V. Miller (Author) (1 replies)
Jason V. Miller (Author) (1 replies)
Linux Kernel Security is Lacking
2005-02-05
Todd Knarr (1 replies)
Todd Knarr (1 replies)
Linux Kernel Security is Lacking
2005-02-09
Joe Borsits (1 replies)
Joe Borsits (1 replies)
Linux Kernel Security is Lacking
2005-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
I eagerly await...
2005-02-03
Anonymous (5 replies)
Anonymous (5 replies)
So, what now about kernel security?
2005-02-03
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
flamer ! is not having an hidden mailing = we do'n't care about security
2005-02-04
Alban Browaeys (1 replies)
Alban Browaeys (1 replies)
flamer ! is not having an hidden mailing = we do'n't care about security
2005-02-04
Jason V. Miller (Author)
Jason V. Miller (Author)

Perhaps not to disclose, but a mail to the list, saying 'Who's responsible for section YYY in the kernel, the MAINTAINERS file isn't clear on this' to the kernel list would no doubt have resulted in a mail address within hours (or perhaps minutes).
Joost
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/296/30374#30374