Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
Mark Rasch, 2005-02-08

Why a Supreme Court decision on canine-assisted roadside searches opens the door to a new regime of Internet surveillance.

Comments Mode:
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-09
Mark D. Rasch (5 replies)
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Kind of off 2005-02-10
MattJordan
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Weak analysis 2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Weak analysis 2005-02-09
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
That makes no sense, Mark. 2005-02-09
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-08
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
MDH (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs - Where is it private v. public 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Does not follow (non sequiter) 2005-02-09
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-09
Michael Britt
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-09
A.W. Montville (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-09
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-09
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-09
Mark Rasch (7 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-09
Bob Radvanovsky
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-09
Anonymous
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-11
Bob Radvanovsky
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Anonymous
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Unanimous
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Mark,

I don't think most would disagree with the principle set forth in your article, but you know Scott McNealey was right...

Don't you recall that old poster with a copy of the original Bill of Rights, that had a big red stamp on it, "Void where Prohibited by Law"?



[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/297/30479#30479
So what is Scott McNealy's home phone number? 2005-02-10
Anonymous
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Mark D. Rasch
Scary... 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Analysis Flaw Revised 2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Analysis Flaw Revised 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Analysis Flaw Revised 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Analysis Flaw Revised 2005-02-10
Mark Rasch (1 replies)
Analysis not flawed but maybe incomplete? 2005-02-10
BC
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
RealisticCanadian
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Louis Helmke
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Caged Rat
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Accuracy of the dog/packet sniffers? 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-12
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
a Seat Sniffer
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Edgar Whipple (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-11
Edgar Whipple
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
BC
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Walt Donovan (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Caged Rat
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous
There is no "right to privacy" 2005-02-10
Andrew C. (1 replies)
There is no "right to privacy" 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-12
Anonymous
Privacy 2005-02-12
Anonymous
Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs - Two different things 2005-02-12
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs,Beam me up captain ,no life here. 2005-02-14
mcmorpheus







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus