, 2005-02-08
Why a Supreme Court decision on canine-assisted roadside searches opens the door to a new regime of Internet surveillance.
Expand all |
Post comment
Logic a bit flawed
2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-08
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-09
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches
2005-02-09
Mark Rasch (7 replies)
Mark Rasch (7 replies)
Analysis Flaw Revised
2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-10
Edgar Whipple (2 replies)
Edgar Whipple (2 replies)

...but we already have random sniffings in Britain it would seem.
Other day when I was in the pub on a busy friday night, the police turned up and stopped anyone leaving while they walked a sniffer dog round the pub - followed by 8 police and a video camera.
Nothing found in our pub so they just moved on - I think they went to every pub in the town that night.
"I want my privacy back, oi, I know your reading this" hehe
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/297/30489#30489