, 2005-02-08
Why a Supreme Court decision on canine-assisted roadside searches opens the door to a new regime of Internet surveillance.
Expand all |
Post comment
Logic a bit flawed
2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-08
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-09
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches
2005-02-09
Mark Rasch (7 replies)
Mark Rasch (7 replies)
Analysis Flaw Revised
2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-10
Edgar Whipple (2 replies)
Edgar Whipple (2 replies)

After all, why would law-abiding citizens want to hide their activities from the government? The fact that your data is encrypted would tend to indicate to the authorities that your are engaged in illegal activity. Encrypting your data will soon be illegal in itself, and grounds for a real search warrant.
Most peolpe are only too willing to believe that only terrorists and child porn aficianados use encryption!
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/297/30505#30505