Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
Mark Rasch, 2005-02-08

Why a Supreme Court decision on canine-assisted roadside searches opens the door to a new regime of Internet surveillance.

Comments Mode:
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-09
Mark D. Rasch (5 replies)
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Kind of off 2005-02-10
MattJordan
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Logic a bit flawed 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Weak analysis 2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Weak analysis 2005-02-09
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
That makes no sense, Mark. 2005-02-09
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-08
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
MDH (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Does not follow (non sequiter) 2005-02-09
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-09
Michael Britt
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-09
A.W. Montville (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-09
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-09
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-09
Mark Rasch (7 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-09
Bob Radvanovsky
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-09
Anonymous
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-11
Bob Radvanovsky
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Anonymous
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Unanimous
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches 2005-02-10
Mark D. Rasch
Scary... 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Analysis Flaw Revised 2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Analysis Flaw Revised 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Analysis Flaw Revised 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Analysis Flaw Revised 2005-02-10
Mark Rasch (1 replies)
I would agree with you as the heat sensor case was ORIGINALLY decided. Kyllo v. United States. However, in the Caballes case, the majority essentially rewrote Kyllo, and said that the ONLY reason the heat sensor was illegal was because it revealed things OTHER than criminal activity - e.g., when Madame was drawing her bath. Thus, the more accurate the technology becomes, the LESS it invades privacy according to the Court. I think it is the other way around, personally.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/297/30516#30516
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
RealisticCanadian
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Louis Helmke
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Caged Rat
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-11
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-12
Anonymous
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
a Seat Sniffer
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Edgar Whipple (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-11
Edgar Whipple
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Walt Donovan (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Caged Rat
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-10
Anonymous
There is no "right to privacy" 2005-02-10
Andrew C. (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs 2005-02-12
Anonymous
Privacy 2005-02-12
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus