, 2005-02-08
Why a Supreme Court decision on canine-assisted roadside searches opens the door to a new regime of Internet surveillance.
Expand all |
Post comment
Logic a bit flawed
2005-02-08
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-08
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-09
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
On Unreasonable Searches
2005-02-09
Mark Rasch (7 replies)
Mark Rasch (7 replies)
Analysis Flaw Revised
2005-02-10
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Of Dog Sniffs and Packet Sniffs
2005-02-10
Edgar Whipple (2 replies)
Edgar Whipple (2 replies)

BTW - no I don't believe, under the circumstances that I suspect you are referring, that you can use "sophisticated technology" to hear a conversation "from thousands of feet away" in a closed room. Under KATZ and/or RIOS, even though a person is in a public place, his conversation that he seeks to preserve as private _may_ be protected under the 4th Amendment.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/297/30550#30550