Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
Cleanliness next to Rootliness
Daniel Hanson, 2005-04-27

Linspire's arguments to only run a desktop system as root has everything to do with privilege seperation, privilege escalation, and some design choices made along the way.

Comments Mode:
Amen! 2005-04-27
Anonymous
Cleanliness next to Rootliness 2005-04-28
Anonymous
Cleanliness next to Rootliness 2005-04-28
SFN
If what I want is an OS that puts no limits on user privileges so that my grandmother can change her wallaper (or anything else about her system), why wouldn't I just have my grandmother use Windows?

Because Linspire is free? It's not.

Because the software to be added to Linspire is free? It only is if my grandmother doesn't go the CNR Warehouse route and does everything using apt-get. She won't.

Because she will have a broader base of knowledgable users from which to draw should she run in to problems? She won't.

Because Microsoft is an unscrupulous, monopolistic, evil entity? Let's be honest. Our grandmothers don't care about that.

Because Linspire is more secure than Windows? Well, it would appear that we are back at the "root" of the issue.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/321/31689#31689
Cleanliness next to Rootliness 2005-04-28
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
Cleanliness next to Rootliness 2005-04-28
dph - author
Cleanliness next to Rootliness 2005-05-05
Anonymous
"Most important" - oh no... 2005-05-04
Phlebas







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus