Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Crime? What crime?
Kelly Martin, 2005-09-14

If there's one thing I've learned in the past few years as editor of SecurityFocus, it's that there is absolutely no saving grace in the security world. Everyone is a target, everyone is vulnerable and exposed, and no one is safe from, well... anything.

Comments Mode:
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-15
stderr
Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-15
Oofus Funnybutt III (4 replies)
Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-16
Oofus Funnybutt III (1 replies)
Re: Re: Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-16
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-28
Oofus Funnybutt III
Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-16
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-10-01
Oofus Funnybutt III
Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-19
stdout
times have changed 2005-09-22
Kelly Martin (1 replies)
Re: times have changed 2005-09-26
Oofus Funnybutt III
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Crime? What crime? 2005-09-29
Anonymous
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-15
Anonymous
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-15
Anonymous
Check the chard on The "Badness Gap" 2005-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Crime of the mind... 2005-09-16
Alexey Vesnin
One Word 2005-09-17
bud
Security? What Security? 2005-09-19
Anonymous
Hackers vs Criminals 2005-09-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: Hackers vs Criminals 2005-09-21
Anonymous
Re: Hackers vs Criminals 2005-09-21
Anonymous
Never has been morals... 2005-09-19
Anon Security Researcher (1 replies)
Honestly, the vast majority of guys out there have no morals whatsoever. They talk about "victims", instead of "targets", and they don't care if some old lady is hacked or if it is a terrorist group -- it is all the same to them.

So, the old ladies get hacked... the weakest get hacked. People who have security precautions tend to not get hacked, while the elderly get the brunt of it. Same as telemarketing scams, same as criminal activity anywhere.

I think there are legitimate uses of offensive hacking. For instance, in hacking serious terrorists or such.

I don't care if kids hack pedophiles or Neo-Nazis.

But, most of them simply do not have the skill to actually target someone -- they get what they can.

As for there being money in the whole business, there is now, there was then.

In a sense, a lot of this is very open... you see a lot of leaders in the business selling vulnerabilities to the highest bidder. They don't care that the highest bidders are governments opposed to their own or organized crime.

You receive offers from all kinds in the field. It is your choice to accept or not accept jobs. It is your responsibility to ensure the person hiring you isn't hiring you to hack some woman they don't know so they can stalk them... and that kind of job is more common then ones with any kind of legitimacy.



[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/355/32400#32400
Re: Never has been morals... 2005-09-22
Bononymous
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-20
Anonymous
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-20
Network Security Proffesional (3 replies)
Re: Crime? What crime? 2005-09-20
Anonymous
Re: Crime? What crime? 2005-09-20
Anonymous
Re: Crime? What crime? 2005-09-24
Anonymous
They hurt us twice 2005-09-21
Marcus Ranum (1 replies)
Re: They hurt us twice 2005-09-21
Richard Rees
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-21
Pork
MacOS X users aren't safe, either! 2005-09-21
Gordon Fecyk
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-22
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus