Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Crime? What crime?
Kelly Martin, 2005-09-14

If there's one thing I've learned in the past few years as editor of SecurityFocus, it's that there is absolutely no saving grace in the security world. Everyone is a target, everyone is vulnerable and exposed, and no one is safe from, well... anything.

Comments Mode:
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-15
stderr
Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-15
Oofus Funnybutt III (4 replies)
Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-16
Oofus Funnybutt III (1 replies)
Re: Re: Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-16
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-28
Oofus Funnybutt III
Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-16
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-10-01
Oofus Funnybutt III
Re: Thanks mom! ...but... 2005-09-19
stdout
times have changed 2005-09-22
Kelly Martin (1 replies)
Re: times have changed 2005-09-26
Oofus Funnybutt III
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Crime? What crime? 2005-09-29
Anonymous
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-15
Anonymous
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-15
Anonymous
Check the chard on The "Badness Gap" 2005-09-15
Anonymous (1 replies)
Crime of the mind... 2005-09-16
Alexey Vesnin
One Word 2005-09-17
bud
Security? What Security? 2005-09-19
Anonymous
Hackers vs Criminals 2005-09-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: Hackers vs Criminals 2005-09-21
Anonymous
Re: Hackers vs Criminals 2005-09-21
Anonymous
Never has been morals... 2005-09-19
Anon Security Researcher (1 replies)
Re: Never has been morals... 2005-09-22
Bononymous
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-20
Anonymous
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-20
Network Security Proffesional (3 replies)
Re: Crime? What crime? 2005-09-20
Anonymous
Re: Crime? What crime? 2005-09-20
Anonymous
Re: Crime? What crime? 2005-09-24
Anonymous
They hurt us twice 2005-09-21
Marcus Ranum (1 replies)
Re: They hurt us twice 2005-09-21
Richard Rees
Nope, it's not the bad guys hurting us twice, it's the inventors who never learn. They're the danger. Look at the Monad exposure - Microsoft knew in 1995 that there was a huge potential exposure in adding scripting capabilities to applications (concept macro virus). However, they didn't THINK and didn't REMEMBER what their own experience taught them, and repeated the mistake with monad.

Ditto with wifi - bluetooth - rfid. People simply don't think beyond what THEY want to do with the technology. The inventors cost us.

In any part of the world, if you want something you have to pay to keep it. Your health? Go to the doctor. Your house? Pay a lawyer for a valid contract, pay for title insurance, pay your taxes that goes to keeping your kids educated and keeping cops around to protect your stuff. We always have to pay.

Another way to look at it, we always have to pay twice. For everything. The fact that this is true in the computer world isn't a mind-bender that everyone misses, it's a painfully obvious fact of life that is assumed.


[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/355/32418#32418
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-21
Pork
MacOS X users aren't safe, either! 2005-09-21
Gordon Fecyk
Crime? What crime? 2005-09-22
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus