, 2005-10-18
People who lived through the Second World War, like my grandparents, had a very different view of money than those of us who grew up in the Information Age. Many of us still remember being told how foolish it is to keep one's life savings under a bed mattress, because the banks were known as trusted entities that will always do a better job of looking after your money. Even my grandparents, albeit reluctantly, came to realize that putting trust in financial institutions was the only way to go.
Expand all |
Post comment
Two-factor banking
2005-10-19
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
Todd Knarr (2 replies)
Re: Two-factor banking
2005-10-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Re: Two-factor banking
2005-10-19
Todd Knarr (1 replies)
Todd Knarr (1 replies)
Two-factor banking
2005-10-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
The regulation does not require two-factor authentication
2005-10-20
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Two-factor banking
2005-10-20
Anonymous (3 replies)
Anonymous (3 replies)

Giving relatively expensive, easy-to-lose tokens to customers just makes it harder, but does not 100% stop attacks. What would stop attacks is (1) complete end-to-end cooperation on user tracking by all ISPs and (2) forceful and swift enforcement by both banks and law enforcement.
How would this stop someone in Russia? Easy. If the ISP doesn't want to play ball to assist in prosecuting criminals - criminals by Russian law as well as US - cut them off. No Internet access. Period. They can't walk away from the table and stay in business, they have to negotiate.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/363/32555#32555