Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Vista
How not to respond to a security advisory
Jason Miller, 2006-01-18

A recently announced weakness in the BSD securelevel system isn't going to be fixed in OpenBSD. While securelevel may have problems, the vendor's security response is unacceptable and doesn't fit with their stated goals.

Comments Mode:
How not to respond to a security advisory 2006-01-19
Anonymous (1 replies)
Linux security contact 2006-01-19
Anonymous
Theo being theo... 2006-01-19
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: Theo being theo... 2006-01-20
Anonymous
What total nonsense. 2006-01-19
Anonymous
How not to respond to a security advisory 2006-01-21
Anonymous (1 replies)
"FreeBSD is still discussing the issue and no further response from the Linux maintainer has been received yet."

You do, of course, realize that FreeBSD is not a Linux maintainer, right? I won't start a flamewar by trying to tell you the technical & ideological differences, so I'll just say this: Net, Open, & Free are from the BSD side of the Unix family tree; Linux, in the early days, was a emulation of the System V side of the tree. So, FreeBSD is not a Linux maintainer.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/380/32994#32994
"Root problem" again 2006-01-24
Alexey Vesnin
How not to respond to a security advisory 2006-01-25
Michael Favinsky (1 replies)
this is a non-issue 2006-02-04
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2008, SecurityFocus