Debunking the WMF backdoor

Debunking the WMF backdoor
Thomas C. Greene, 2006-01-23

Claims that the WMF vulnerability was an intentional backdoor into Windows systems makes for an interesting conspiracy theory, but doesn't fit with the facts.

Expand all | Post comment

Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-23
Rick Luther

Finally Someone said it... 2006-01-24
Jon Hash

Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-24
assurbanipal (1 replies)

Re: Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-30
Alexey Vesnin

Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-24
Anonymous

Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-24
ScuzzMonkey (1 replies)

Re: Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-25
Ikester

Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-24
ScuzzMonkey (2 replies)

Re: Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-24
Kelly Martin (1 replies)

Re: Re: Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-25
Steve Bostedor

Re: Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-25
elMurado

Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-25
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Debunking the WMF backdoor 2006-01-27
Penguinisto

Mr. Greene, I wouldn't be surprised if you get sued for this. 2006-01-25
Roger (2 replies)

Re: Mr. Greene, I wouldn't be surprised if you get sued for this. 2006-01-27
Anonymous

Re: Mr. Greene, I wouldn't be surprised if you get sued for this. 2006-01-30
Anonymous (1 replies)

Re: Re: Mr. Greene, I wouldn't be surprised if you get sued for this. 2006-02-01
Roger

Gibson is an idiot 2006-02-09
Anonymous

He's nothing but bluster and bullspit. Simple question - if Gibson is so damn smart, why won't he submit any of his "research" to public forums for analysis? Why is NONE of his "data" had ANY peer-review?

There is a simple answer. Educated and skilled people laugh at Gibson. He's a fraud. And anybody who takes him seriously is clearly a joke as well.

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/382/33103#33103

Your mistake 2006-05-30
henriko