, 2006-01-30
The U.S. government's broad subpoena to search engines effectively seeks to mine the data of the Internet. While Google has resisted the subpoena, there may be little they can do to protect our privacy from many prying eyes.
Expand all |
Post comment
Google's data minefield
2006-01-30
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Re: Google's data minefield
2006-01-30
Google has an ethical obligation (3 replies)
Google has an ethical obligation (3 replies)
Google's data minefield
2006-01-30
Google has an ethical obligation (3 replies)
Google has an ethical obligation (3 replies)
Google's data minefield
2006-01-31
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
American society is so hypocritical!
2006-02-02
Jeremy Young (2 replies)
Jeremy Young (2 replies)
Re: American society is so hypocritical!
2006-02-03
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Google's data minefield
2006-02-02
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
In addition, I should personally act as a facilitator of government censorship; i.e. I should follow the laws. I personally cannot distribute porn to minors.
Search engines need to follow local laws.
Google should work with the government. The subpoena is necessary because Google said no. "Is this the government's objective? To deputize ISP's...", the stated objective is what the government states! Let's not bring innuendo into the government's stated purpose. Let's work together with our branches of government.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/383/33060#33060