, 2006-02-20
A recent case involving a stolen laptop containing 550,000 people's full credit information sheds new night on what "reasonable" protections a company must make to secure its customer data - and what customers need to prove in order to sue for damages.
Expand all |
Post comment
Strict liability for data breaches?
2006-02-21
Adam (1 replies)
Adam (1 replies)
Strict liability for data breaches?
2006-02-21
Stephen T (1 replies)
Stephen T (1 replies)
Strict liability for data breaches?
2006-02-23
Anonymous (2 replies)
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: Strict liability for data breaches?
2006-02-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

Guin picked the wrong battle. He couldn't prove his data was on the laptop nor could he prove any injury. Data breach laws are still maturing. Challenging the law in a case where the laptop was stolen from a house probably wasn't the best move. There are numerous companies out there that have done much worse.
Whether the defendent was truly negligent or just under educated on proper security controls will never be known. With laws in their current form, I think the courts made the right decision.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/387/33174#33174