Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Strict liability for data breaches?
Mark Rasch, 2006-02-20

A recent case involving a stolen laptop containing 550,000 people's full credit information sheds new night on what "reasonable" protections a company must make to secure its customer data - and what customers need to prove in order to sue for damages.

Comments Mode:
Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-21
Adam (1 replies)
Re: Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-22
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-21
Jim (Sydney, Australia) (1 replies)
Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-21
Stephen T (1 replies)
Re: Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-22
Anonymous (1 replies)
Shameful ruling 2006-02-22
Torquemada
Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-22
Frank, Hsv, AL
Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-23
Anonymous (2 replies)
Re: Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-23
Mark D. Rasch
Re: Strict liability for data breaches? 2006-02-23
Anonymous (1 replies)
Judge Made Law 2006-02-24
Mark D. Rasch (1 replies)
Re: Judge Made Law 2006-03-05
Anonymous (1 replies)
With regard to the small amount of damage concern, I was surprised that the case wasn't sounded in the context of a class action.

(Aside: The plaintiff's attorney is a well-known outfit here in the Twin Cities, known primarily for bringing fair credit collection actions against banks and other lenders -- churn and burn actions for the most part. I suspect that they stepped into waters they didn't know all that well and were blindsided by a big firm that knew better. I suspect that had this case been brought by lawyers more attuned to the nuances raised by Mr. Rasch that we would have had a more interesting result.)

[ reply ]

Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/columns/387/33261#33261
Re: Re: Judge Made Law 2006-03-15
Anonymous







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus